This season in films is filled with heroes - a bright red one, a uniquely American girl, someone who is not so smart, a kick-ass panda and even a nasty, snarky superhero.
I depend on heroes in my media diet, even pretend ones, to embody hope and to point out a path for slaying the dragons (real & imaginary) that arise in my journey. Lisa, my wife, is a living, breathing hero of mine - she teaches me so many lessons about how dragons might not be so scary. People who compete in the Olympics have always been heroes of mine, ever since my mom & I watched the '72 Games in Munich. Artists are heroes of mine - the way they animate life and live in a rhythm that is their own.
Tara Hunt had a great post on what it means to be a hero, in which she lays out some of the attributes of heroes she groks:
#1, to be a hero is to be selfless
#2, to be a hero is to hold true to a code of ethics
#3, heroism requires action
#4 ability to be egolessness
#5, heroes don’t discriminate
That is a pretty high bar Tara sets - it is tempting to be cynical and not even try to meet that standard. But more & more, I am reminded that cynicism is a spear with fear at the tip, looking to pierce creation in all it's beauty. Even at age 44, I need heroes to stave off that cynicism, to fend off the spears.
I really resonated with Tara's point about another aspect that makes heroes so captivating:
They falter. They have times where they don’t want to be heroes. They want to be “normal”.
This is not what we expect of people in our lives - we do not expect friends to falter, we are thrown off when "heroes" want some time off, when they hunger to be normal.
This is particularly the case when faith is part of the equation. Pastors fall, soul friends are normal broken people, great artists or writers so often do not want to be great or heroic or ab-normal.
I thought of this again when I read Uncertainties About the Role of Doubt in Religion, in which Peter Steinfels asks a powerful question:
So what exactly does it mean that many contemporary believers will be
living their faith “in a condition of doubt and uncertainty”?
So much of my cultural experience of faith is holding up the pretense of certainty, covering up the doubt. Just like the superhero outfits that Peter Parker or Princess Diana of Themyscira dress up in, I think of my faith as some "outfit" that I needcto pt on when things get dangerous.
The summer 2008 film season started pretty cynically for me, with a hero from my younger trotted out in a film that was just beneath the talents of all involved. But over the last few weeks, I have been lucky to sit in a dark room with hundreds of other people living in doubt & uncertainty, animated by the stories of two rogue robots and the narrative imagined by artist Bob Kane and writer Bill Finge.
This summer's gift from the folks at Pixar is WALL-E, conceptualized, written & directed by Andrew Stanton. A commentor I adore - Rod Dreher - has described this film as a "postmodern masterpiece ....one of the most subversive films I've ever seen", even going so far as to describe it as what would happen if "Wendell Berry made a sci-fi movie for kids". As proof of what a truly extraordinary work this is, a writter on the other end of the political spectrum - Frank Rich - writes in glowing terms about a movies that clings to "the fleeting green memory of the extinct miracle of photosynthesis is as dazzling and elusive as the emerald city of Oz."
In this interview, Stanton, a self-described Christian, unpacks some of the heroism that this work of art captures:
Well, what really interested me was the idea of the most human thing
in the universe being a machine because it has more interest in finding
out what the point of living is than actual people. The greatest
commandment Christ gives us is to love, but that's not always our
priority. So I came up with this premise that could demonstrate what I
was trying to say--that irrational love defeats the world's
programming. You've got these two robots that are trying to go above
their basest directives, literally their programming, to experience
love.
With the human characters I wanted to show that our programming is
the routines and habits that distract us to the point that we're not
really making connections to the people next to us. We're not engaging
in relationships, which are the point of living--relationship with God
and relationship with other people.

As my buddy rick writes, The Dark Knight is not "just" a comic book story - it is much more than that - it is:
a crime drama, a jarring and frightening
suspense movie, a meditation on good and evil, a challenge to beliefs
and assumptions about order and chaos and human nature; it's a
collection of psychological studies, a descent into despair, a call for
hope, a horror movie with a mass murderer stalking citizens, a story of
love and loyalty. and it's got kickass action. and brilliant, subtle,
serious acting.
I was most struck by the tension between anarchy & order that Joker & Batman embody. The Joker challenges the conventions of a villain in that he has no inhibitions and refuses to adhere even to the ultra-basic moral code of criminal. The Joker traffics in terror, plays with the very nature of what being a hero means, makes a joke of the idea of good existing or triumphing. The climatic boat scene will no doubt be shown countless times as a sort of social experiment to test heroism among common folk.
I must say I have been somewhat haunted by how the film ends. Batman takes on a mantle of darkness, some we must hunt & attempt to capture. The community is now part of this heroism - it is no longer a single figure who holds hope.
Paul Fromont blogged recently about a book we both recently read - The Promise of Paradox: A Celebration of Contradictions in the Christian Life. Parker Palmer is a hero of mine - an author, educator, and activist who focuses on issues in education, community, leadership, spirituality and social change. He lives & writes in the world that Peter Steinfels captures - he also reaches for the type of hero that Tara Hunt captures. But his heroism, at least for me, comes in the way he talks openly about how he falters, his struggles with depression & pride, his very normal-ness.
Paul points to a section of Palmer's re-released book, which for me could easily fit into the stories of rogue robots and a dark knight:
“ …The
capacity to embrace true paradoxes is more than an intellectual skill
for holding complex thoughts. It is a life skill for holding complex
experiences. Take for example our encounter with “the other,” with the
person who sees a different reality from ours because he or she stands
in a different place. To some extent, the other contradicts not only
our thoughts but also our lives, and that can be threatening. If we
lack the capacity to allow this to segue into a paradox – a both-and
that has the potential to open our minds and hearts to something new –
we will most likely fall back on our hard-wired “fight or flight”
response. But if we understand the promise of paradox, our encounters
with “the other” have the potential to make our world larger, more
generous and more helpful…
If
we are willing to “hang in there” with a country, a colleague… a child
[or a fellow Christian with a different understanding of Biblical
interpretation, sexual ethics, truth, and orthodoxy] – holding the
unresolved tension between reality and possibility and inviting
something new into being – we have a chance to participate in the
evolution of a better reality..
Recent Comments